3/30/2023 0 Comments Does flickr uploadr upload videos![]() If this is the case, do we really want large processing volume burdens being developed? It’s fine for occassional situations, but if the number of people using it grows, then you might be getting faster processing of your uploads, but causing unacceptable delays in other parts of the system such as in just loading observation views! I would encourage you to contact the developers to make sure your impact will not be detrimental. This might explain why an external uploader might be getting faster results. I think the upload might be staggered, meaning that it doesn’t all get processed at once and the site come to a grinding halt for everyone else while it processes. I think bottlenecks are going to be (in order of impact): But even then, mine would not take more than 30 mins tops to upload 100 obs with approx 200 photos. I know my camera is set to take photos that are nearly double in size (or 4x the qty of pixels!) to the iNat max. You could test it by doing a similar size batch but with the photos all pre-scaled to the iNat maximums. The system has to resize images that are too large, and that will contribute greatly to the processing time of an upload. The only major thing missing from the current apis seems to be ID suggestions using inat’s computer vision - but I very rarely use that, so that’s not a big deal for me.Īnd what is the average size (in megabytes) of the photos you are uploading? It also allows me to add annotations at the same time and simplifies the process of grouping multiple photos.Įven if the issue with loading metadata was somehow fixed, I doubt whether I would want to use the web interface for uploading again. Doing things this way dramatically reduces the total upload time, and I can just run it in the background while I do other things. It also uses python, but not pyinaturalist, since I wanted more control over how the inat apis are used. So in the end, I went down the same route as and wrote my own uploader. But even then, I still found it was taking far longer than it really should do, and every now and I would have to abort it due the browser locking up. I found that I had to limit my batches to about 25 observations to make the process workable. I can confirm this - other than uploading the photos, the main bottleneck seems to be loading the metadata. I found that waiting until absolutely all the metadata has loaded, on all the photos, before starting to work on them has significantly reduced freezing/crashing the browser That seems like it could be made to be quite a bit less fussy than the existing website. To be actually useful to a large audience would require a desktop program of a similar GUI to the website. Should work on any operating system, but I have only tested it on Windows 10 so that might be wishful thinking.īut I digress. If you had ten thousand photos of pigeons, one photo per pigeon, than this script would allow you to simply put them all in a folder named ‘Rock Pigeon’ and run the script. The only reason anyone would be crazy enough to do that is if they happen to be sitting on a few thousands or tens of thousands of geotagged photos of the same species that they want to upload. For anyone to use it in its present state would require installing python, installing pyinaturalist, downloading the python scripts, then organize photos and run the scripts. exe file is a bit challenging though so I haven’t done that. I sort of published it, in that I posted it to github so anyone who wants it can use it. Upload times would of course be the same, but it would be possible to just have it run in the background. This seems like it could result in quicker times to organize photos and a much lower risk of a crash losing the work. Organize the photos, add the ID and annotations, then either upload a batch of observations or upload all of them. I am thinking a combination of the existing iPhone uploader and the website uploader. It would be really nice if it came as a stand-alone program. When it crashes you can lose a lot of work and slow internet can really bog down the process. ![]() When the internet is slow, it takes quite a while to upload. That drove home the point that the weak point of the present upload system on the PC is the web browser. I no longer am worrying about a crash on the website destroying my progress. However I am not much of a programmer so I didn’t end up with anything which can really compete with the website uploader except in a few niche scenarios. This has resulted in a script which I can match the upload speed of the website. I have been playing around with pyinaturalist for a few weeks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |